My mother was born and raised in Hollywood -- and she vividly remembers the community outrage over a developer's plan to sub-divide a particularly scenic part of the Hollywood Hills. What was especially galling was that the developers seemed to flaunt their disregard for these unique L.A. hillsides by erecting a huge billboard to announce their new project.

The year was 1923. My mother was an adorable seven-year-old with ringlets.  And the intrusive sign said "HOLLYWOODLAND".

Ironic that some 87 years later, the battle to protect and preserve the now world-famous HOLLYWOOD sign centers around another real estate scheme. This time an investment syndicate from Chicago is threatening to build four luxurious estates on the mountaintop surrounding the sign -- unless, of course, some chump -- er, buyer -- meets their $20 million dollar price tag...

... which feels more like a ransom note to me, a variation of "Do what we say or we'll trash your heritage".  How 'bout they trash their own heritage? Use their bank accounts to tear down Wrigley Field, or put condos in Grant Park to block everyone's view of Lake Michigan, instead of trying to degrade the one and only public symbol my hometown has? 

Fortunately, a civic-minded alliance has sprung up to raise money to buy the property and place it in a public trust. When I first visited their website (http://www.savehollywoodland.org/about/the-campaign.php), I read a lot of tweets, and what struck me/moved me was that virtually everyone has a very personalized connection to the sign. Goes for me too.

Being a native who was raised in the hills, I often thought about sliding down the bramble and scrambling the letters -- especially after "Hollyweed" appeared one morning in the 70's (http://hightimes.com/news/dan/3790 ). Now you know what inspired Beverly Hills, 90210 to end its triumphant high school years with Brandon, Brenda and the rest of the gang looking up at their adulterated 'West Bev High' Hollywood sign at sunrise after camping out on Grad night. 

And showbizzle's ongoing love affair with the HOLLYWOOD sign was captured in a very cool , three-part monologue written by Joey Power and performed by Austen Parros, who plays Les, the hip restaurateur. (http://www.showbizzle.com/ds-12flv ).

But it's not the sign, but what the sign represents, which dovetails so effortlessly with showbizzle's long- term goal to "Make Hollywood User-Friendly".  The sign represents hope and glamour, commerce and civic pride.  Take that away and this town becomes little more than a theme park for tourists hoping to catch the faded memory of a bygone era.

That's why we are so impressed by the commitment of Turner Classic Movies to tie its first Film Festival  http://www.tcm.com/festival/  into support for the “Save The Peak” campaign.  More on that next week, but until then, if you make a $20 donation and send a confirming e-mail to us at info@showbizzle.com, we will make a gift in your honor so we can all "Make Hollywood User-Friendly". 

Anonymous's picture
You start out the blog great noting that Fox River Financial Resources is holding the property for ransom, but then you try to convince people to pay the ransom. Fox River bought the property during the real estate boom in 202 for a mere $2.67M, and then with a little stroke of luck by finding the ability to create a road to the land, they say it worth $40 million. No one took the bait. Then they said it was worth $22M. Still no one took the bait. Now like a department store sale, they are offering to the Trust for Public Land for half price! Just please don't read into it that 80% of the price is pure profit. Note that the sites you noted has raised $3.1M as of today and over half the cost is to be paid for by deferred Parks and Recreation budget and bond money (Public Debt). With the state in near fiscal insolvency, is this a wise move? Fox River threatens that they will sell the property to developers. Yet so far they have not been able to find a buyer, even in the best of times. But simply the land is overvalued and the TPL is blinded by the supposed option price they set with Fox River Financial Resources. I think it's high time everyone gets realistic about this campaign. This is America and Fox River has every right to make a profit on their investment, but the amount they want is completely unreasonable in this economic environment and too many good intentioned people are being blinded by nostalgia.
Anonymous's picture
Oh, I don't disagree with your point of view in that the land is over-valued, and that the lack of support for city services like Parks and Rec. Clearly, I wasn't (and still am not) that conversant with the stench of the deal. My point is that the sign is a historical landmark and a living symbol that bears preservation. and it's okay to be anonymous, but I always enjoy knowing who I am talking to.
Anonymous's picture
this is an important cause, and that story expresses very well one of the countless reasons why we need to preserve this landmark. What I don't understand is why the film industry hasn't saved it for us already--they have the money.
Anonymous's picture
i agree -- it shows how corporate hollywood has become... stay tuned for part two
Anonymous's picture
You'll have to be more convincing than that for me to part with my money. Better look next time
Anonymous's picture
just wanted to bring to everyone's attention about what is going on? The donation part was/is the least of it. maybe with a public outcry the developers will withdraw their threat to develop, and find a way (through a tax credit?) to put the money towards maintaining the site for Parks and Rec. btw, are you an LA native?

Post new comment